← TruNorth

AkzoNobel vs Eastman Chemical

On overall TruNorth grade, AkzoNobel scores higher (AkzoNobel: B, Eastman Chemical: F). Both graded from public records across nine values categories.

B
AkzoNobel
62/100
F
Eastman Chemical
32.1/100

Political donations

AkzoNobel

FEC: $121K in executive political donations; partisan lean split across 6 executive donors.

Eastman Chemical

FEC: $50K PAC donations; 88% to Republican, 12% to Democratic committees.

Environment

AkzoNobel

No public record found.

Eastman Chemical

water pollution violation: $25.4M in federal penalties (Violation Tracker).

Labor

AkzoNobel

No public record found.

Eastman Chemical

184 federal penalties totaling $144.0M since 2000 (Violation Tracker).

DEI

AkzoNobel

No public record found.

Eastman Chemical

EEO-1 workforce demographics on federal record (FY2020, DOL OFCCP FOIA release): 10,611 US employees — 23.5% women, 12% racial/ethnic minorities; management 24.9% women, 11.6% minorities.

Charity

AkzoNobel

No public record found.

Eastman Chemical

No public record found.

Animal testing

AkzoNobel

No public record found.

Eastman Chemical

No public record found.

Firearms

AkzoNobel

No public record found.

Eastman Chemical

No public record found.

Privacy

AkzoNobel

No public record found.

Eastman Chemical

No public record found.

Executive pay

AkzoNobel

No public record found.

Eastman Chemical

No public record found.

Compare any two brands on the values you care about — personalized to your 30-second quiz.

Open TruNorth →