ANGIODYNAMICS vs Boston Scientific
On overall TruNorth grade, Boston Scientific scores higher (ANGIODYNAMICS: D, Boston Scientific: C). Both graded from public records across nine values categories.
Political donations
FEC: $316K in executive political donations; partisan lean split across 12 executive donors.
FEC: $28K PAC donations; 69% to Republican, 31% to Democratic committees.
Environment
No public record found.
No public record found.
Labor
1 federal penalties totaling $12.5M since 2000 (Violation Tracker).
19 federal penalties totaling $1.6B since 2000 (Violation Tracker).
DEI
EEO-1 workforce demographics on federal record (FY2020, DOL OFCCP FOIA release): 722 US employees — 51.5% women, 10.8% racial/ethnic minorities; management 33.9% women, 6.3% minorities.
EEO-1 workforce demographics on federal record (FY2020, DOL OFCCP FOIA release): 17,380 US employees — 45.2% women, 30.8% racial/ethnic minorities; management 39.8% women, 18% minorities.
Charity
No public record found.
$9M reported corporate giving in 2024 (~0.06% of revenue) via Boston Scientific Foundation.
Animal testing
No public record found.
No public record found.
Firearms
No public record found.
No public record found.
Privacy
No public record found.
No public record found.
Executive pay
No public record found.
CEO-to-median-worker pay ratio 348:1 (median employee pay $67,539) — SEC proxy statement (DEF 14A, 2026).
Compare any two brands on the values you care about — personalized to your 30-second quiz.
Open TruNorth →