← TruNorth

Baxter International vs Cytosorbents

On overall TruNorth grade, Baxter International scores higher (Baxter International: C, Cytosorbents: F). Both graded from public records across nine values categories.

C
Baxter International
38/100
F
Cytosorbents
0/100

Political donations

Baxter International

No public record found.

Cytosorbents

FEC: $115K in executive political donations; partisan lean split across 6 executive donors.

Environment

Baxter International

No public record found.

Cytosorbents

No public record found.

Labor

Baxter International

37 federal penalties totaling $682.7M since 2000 (Violation Tracker).

Cytosorbents

No public record found.

DEI

Baxter International

EEO-1 workforce demographics on federal record (FY2020, DOL OFCCP FOIA release): 12,378 US employees — 45.5% women, 29.1% racial/ethnic minorities; management 40.8% women, 22.1% minorities.

Cytosorbents

No public record found.

Charity

Baxter International

$18M reported corporate giving in 2024 (~0.13% of revenue) via Baxter International Foundation.

Cytosorbents

No public record found.

Animal testing

Baxter International

No public record found.

Cytosorbents

No public record found.

Firearms

Baxter International

No public record found.

Cytosorbents

No public record found.

Privacy

Baxter International

No public record found.

Cytosorbents

No public record found.

Executive pay

Baxter International

No public record found.

Cytosorbents

No public record found.

Compare any two brands on the values you care about — personalized to your 30-second quiz.

Open TruNorth →