← TruNorth

Baxter International vs Pacira BioSciences

On overall TruNorth grade, Pacira BioSciences scores higher (Baxter International: F, Pacira BioSciences: B). Both graded from public records across nine values categories.

F
Baxter International
31.3/100
B
Pacira BioSciences
62.4/100

Political donations

Baxter International

No public record found.

Pacira BioSciences

FEC: $310K in executive political donations; partisan lean split across 8 executive donors.

Environment

Baxter International

No public record found.

Pacira BioSciences

No public record found.

Labor

Baxter International

37 federal penalties totaling $682.7M since 2000 (Violation Tracker).

Pacira BioSciences

2 federal penalties totaling $3.5M since 2000 (Violation Tracker).

DEI

Baxter International

EEO-1 workforce demographics on federal record (FY2020, DOL OFCCP FOIA release): 12,378 US employees — 45.5% women, 29.1% racial/ethnic minorities; management 40.8% women, 22.1% minorities.

Pacira BioSciences

No public record found.

Charity

Baxter International

$18M reported corporate giving in 2024 (~0.13% of revenue) via Baxter International Foundation.

Pacira BioSciences

No public record found.

Animal testing

Baxter International

No public record found.

Pacira BioSciences

No public record found.

Firearms

Baxter International

No public record found.

Pacira BioSciences

No public record found.

Privacy

Baxter International

No public record found.

Pacira BioSciences

No public record found.

Executive pay

Baxter International

No public record found.

Pacira BioSciences

CEO-to-median-worker pay ratio 68:1 (median employee pay $233,124) — SEC proxy statement (DEF 14A, 2025).

Compare any two brands on the values you care about — personalized to your 30-second quiz.

Open TruNorth →