Boston Scientific vs Edwards Lifesciences
On overall TruNorth grade, Edwards Lifesciences scores higher (Boston Scientific: D, Edwards Lifesciences: C). Both graded from public records across nine values categories.
Political donations
FEC: $28K PAC donations; 69% to Republican, 31% to Democratic committees.
FEC: $43K PAC donations; 58% to Republican, 42% to Democratic committees.
Environment
No public record found.
hazardous waste Violation: $250K in federal penalties (Violation Tracker).
Labor
19 federal penalties totaling $1.6B since 2000 (Violation Tracker).
2 federal penalties totaling $269K since 2000 (Violation Tracker).
DEI
EEO-1 workforce demographics on federal record (FY2020, DOL OFCCP FOIA release): 17,380 US employees — 45.2% women, 30.8% racial/ethnic minorities; management 39.8% women, 18% minorities.
EEO-1 workforce demographics on federal record (FY2020, DOL OFCCP FOIA release): 6,546 US employees — 56% women, 60.3% racial/ethnic minorities; management 38.4% women, 39.6% minorities.
Charity
$9M reported corporate giving in 2024 (~0.06% of revenue) via Boston Scientific Foundation.
$15M reported corporate giving in 2024 (~0.29% of revenue) via Edwards Lifesciences Foundation. Operates the Edwards Lifesciences Foundation: $9.2M in charitable contributions, gifts & grants paid (FY2023, IRS Form 990-PF).
Animal testing
No public record found.
No public record found.
Firearms
No public record found.
No public record found.
Privacy
No public record found.
No public record found.
Executive pay
CEO-to-median-worker pay ratio 348:1 (median employee pay $67,539) — SEC proxy statement (DEF 14A, 2026).
No public record found.
Compare any two brands on the values you care about — personalized to your 30-second quiz.
Open TruNorth →