← TruNorth

CHAMPIONS ONCOLOGY vs Guardant Health

On overall TruNorth grade, Guardant Health scores higher (CHAMPIONS ONCOLOGY: B, Guardant Health: A). Both graded from public records across nine values categories.

B
CHAMPIONS ONCOLOGY
61.8/100
A
Guardant Health
68/100

Political donations

CHAMPIONS ONCOLOGY

FEC: $273K in executive political donations; partisan lean split across 11 executive donors.

Guardant Health

FEC: $418K in executive political donations; partisan lean split across 12 executive donors.

Environment

CHAMPIONS ONCOLOGY

No public record found.

Guardant Health

No public record found.

Labor

CHAMPIONS ONCOLOGY

No public record found.

Guardant Health

No public record found.

DEI

CHAMPIONS ONCOLOGY

No public record found.

Guardant Health

EEO-1 workforce demographics on federal record (FY2020, DOL OFCCP FOIA release): 860 US employees — 55.2% women, 59.5% racial/ethnic minorities; management 46% women, 48.5% minorities.

Charity

CHAMPIONS ONCOLOGY

No public record found.

Guardant Health

No public record found.

Animal testing

CHAMPIONS ONCOLOGY

No public record found.

Guardant Health

No public record found.

Firearms

CHAMPIONS ONCOLOGY

No public record found.

Guardant Health

No public record found.

Privacy

CHAMPIONS ONCOLOGY

No public record found.

Guardant Health

No public record found.

Executive pay

CHAMPIONS ONCOLOGY

No public record found.

Guardant Health

CEO-to-median-worker pay ratio 44:1 (median employee pay $198,418) — SEC proxy statement (DEF 14A, 2026).

Compare any two brands on the values you care about — personalized to your 30-second quiz.

Open TruNorth →